Post by account_disabled on Mar 8, 2024 22:26:44 GMT -5
Mediation is a real art capable of resolving disputes. A method that can be used in various areas of human society. Mediating, negotiating, knowing how to approach issues with balance and equanimity is a skill. An ability, a skill , required in the dynamics of the corporate world, but also in micro-social contexts and in macro ones (international politics). But mediating is a quality that must be sought after, possessed, trained, refined . It does not fall from the sky nor is it within everyone's reach. Knowing how to mediate is an art, and is useful in building peaceful and constructive realities.
In this article we will explore: Mediation and conflict: two parts in the human Germany Phone Number relationship Mediation: the social spheres Mediation: the figure of the social broker and his functions Cultural mediation: from migrants to society Mediation: stage models Mediation: oriented models and techniques Mediation: outcomes, limits and advantages Mediation: the role and skills Mediation: context and communication Mediation: Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution (MARC) Mediation and negotiation: the corporate context Mediation and negotiation: the spirit, the context, the strategy Mediation and negotiation: techniques and traps Mediation and negotiation: figures and roles Mediation: from the corporate field to the digital field Mediation: fundamental function of all human relationships Bibliography Mediation as an art of dispute resolution Homo Videns: the modification of human minds Roberto Siconolfi Webinar & Live Q&A – March 21st from 4pm DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE WEBINAR MATERIAL › Mediation and conflict: two parts in the human relationship At an overall level, of its own phenomenology, we could define both mediation and conflict as two parts, sometimes complementary, or successive, of the human relationship.
We could identify both as the state of peace or that of war, that of quiet or agitation/conflict, states that are first and foremost internal, and which from human interiority reverberate in the external world , and therefore inevitably in the relationship with others. If mediating is therefore a state of equilibrium , in which the parties in relation, two or more subjects, individual or collective subjects, converge towards the same point, without friction, or without particular friction; on the other hand the conflict is a bit like pulling on the rope and unbalancing it entirely on one side, putting more weight on one of the two plates of the scale. Of course, both modes contribute to maintaining an overall balance, as we have seen from the examples, both modes fall within unity, albeit in different ways.
In this article we will explore: Mediation and conflict: two parts in the human Germany Phone Number relationship Mediation: the social spheres Mediation: the figure of the social broker and his functions Cultural mediation: from migrants to society Mediation: stage models Mediation: oriented models and techniques Mediation: outcomes, limits and advantages Mediation: the role and skills Mediation: context and communication Mediation: Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution (MARC) Mediation and negotiation: the corporate context Mediation and negotiation: the spirit, the context, the strategy Mediation and negotiation: techniques and traps Mediation and negotiation: figures and roles Mediation: from the corporate field to the digital field Mediation: fundamental function of all human relationships Bibliography Mediation as an art of dispute resolution Homo Videns: the modification of human minds Roberto Siconolfi Webinar & Live Q&A – March 21st from 4pm DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE WEBINAR MATERIAL › Mediation and conflict: two parts in the human relationship At an overall level, of its own phenomenology, we could define both mediation and conflict as two parts, sometimes complementary, or successive, of the human relationship.
We could identify both as the state of peace or that of war, that of quiet or agitation/conflict, states that are first and foremost internal, and which from human interiority reverberate in the external world , and therefore inevitably in the relationship with others. If mediating is therefore a state of equilibrium , in which the parties in relation, two or more subjects, individual or collective subjects, converge towards the same point, without friction, or without particular friction; on the other hand the conflict is a bit like pulling on the rope and unbalancing it entirely on one side, putting more weight on one of the two plates of the scale. Of course, both modes contribute to maintaining an overall balance, as we have seen from the examples, both modes fall within unity, albeit in different ways.